<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traveling Wilburys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneneatthingaday.wordpress.com/2008/03/14/traveling-wilburys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneneatthingaday.wordpress.com/2008/03/14/traveling-wilburys/</link>
	<description>Or two or three or four or...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aimee Wilbury</title>
		<link>http://oneneatthingaday.wordpress.com/2008/03/14/traveling-wilburys/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Wilbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneneatthingaday.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-205</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Wilburys fan. Although there aren&#039;t very many Wilburys videos, there are a lot of what I call &quot;pseudo-Wilburys&quot; videos. Meaning, there&#039;s more than one Wilbury in it, but its not the Wilburys. Examples are Tom Petty&#039;s &lt;b&gt;I Won&#039;t Back Down&lt;/b&gt; and the Dylan/Petty tour back in &#039;86-early &#039;87. 

Why no &lt;b&gt;Volume 2&lt;/b&gt;? My theory is it&#039;s a joke. Other theories say that there were bootlegs called Volume 2, it&#039;s a tribute to Roy Orbison&#039;s death, or Tom Petty&#039;s &lt;b&gt;Full Moon Fever&lt;/b&gt;, due to the Wilbury collaborations, is Volume 2. (Strange thing is, Full Moon Fever was recorded BEFORE the Wilburys -- but it was released AFTER the Wilburys!)

I have one Question, though: If Full Moon Fever is &lt;b&gt;Volume 2&lt;/b&gt;, does that make Mike Campbell a pseudo-Sidebury? 

Okay, I&#039;ll shut up now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Wilburys fan. Although there aren&#8217;t very many Wilburys videos, there are a lot of what I call &#8220;pseudo-Wilburys&#8221; videos. Meaning, there&#8217;s more than one Wilbury in it, but its not the Wilburys. Examples are Tom Petty&#8217;s <b>I Won&#8217;t Back Down</b> and the Dylan/Petty tour back in &#8216;86-early &#8216;87. </p>
<p>Why no <b>Volume 2</b>? My theory is it&#8217;s a joke. Other theories say that there were bootlegs called Volume 2, it&#8217;s a tribute to Roy Orbison&#8217;s death, or Tom Petty&#8217;s <b>Full Moon Fever</b>, due to the Wilbury collaborations, is Volume 2. (Strange thing is, Full Moon Fever was recorded BEFORE the Wilburys &#8212; but it was released AFTER the Wilburys!)</p>
<p>I have one Question, though: If Full Moon Fever is <b>Volume 2</b>, does that make Mike Campbell a pseudo-Sidebury? </p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll shut up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
